In 2024, U.S. states attempted to pass AI laws addressing issues like hiring, housing, political advertising, and insurance. However, many of these proposals failed, illustrating the complexities of balancing innovation with transparency and accountability. While state laws remain fragmented, businesses must prepare for stricter AI regulations on the horizon. Waiting until regulations are finalized could leave your organization vulnerable to compliance gaps and legal challenges. DataProbity helps organizations take a proactive approach to AI governance, ensuring responsible AI practices even in an uncertain regulatory environment. Reach out today! to build a governance strategy that prepares you for whatever comes next.

---

The Struggle to Regulate AI in U.S. State Legislatures

In 2024, U.S. state legislatures introduced a wave of ambitious bills aimed at regulating artificial intelligence across industries, from hiring and housing to political advertising and insurance. However, many of these state-level proposals failed to pass, reflecting deep divisions among policymakers, industry stakeholders, and advocacy groups. These failures highlight the challenges of crafting AI regulations that balance innovation with public safety, transparency, and accountability. From California’s efforts to mandate AI safety mechanisms to New York’s push for fairness in employment algorithms, the struggles of these state laws offer critical insights into the complexities of AI governance.

Major AI Bills That Failed in 2024

Several high-profile AI bills were introduced in 2024, targeting areas such as political advertising, real estate, insurance underwriting, and automated decision-making. Despite their ambitious goals, these bills faced significant opposition and ultimately failed to become law.

---

---

Balancing Innovation and Regulation

One of the most significant challenges in AI legislation is striking a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring public safety. For example, California’s SB 1047, known as the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Systems Act, proposed stringent pre-training requirements for developers of high-risk AI models. However, there were concerns that the bill would stifle innovation and burden smaller developers, which led to its veto.

Unclear Enforcement Mechanisms

Many bills failed due to a lack of clear enforcement mechanisms. Hawaii’s SB 2524, which aimed to address algorithmic bias in high-risk AI decision-making, struggled to define actionable enforcement measures. Similarly, Florida’s SB 850, which sought to require disclaimers on AI-generated political advertisements, lacked a clear path for compliance oversight.

Compliance Costs and Industry Resistance

Compliance costs emerged as a major roadblock for several bills. California’s AB 2930, which required annual AI impact assessments for automated decision tools, and Colorado’s HB 24-1057, which sought to ban AI-driven rent pricing, faced strong industry resistance. Businesses argued that these measures would impose excessive financial and operational burdens.

---

---

AI-Generated Content and Transparency

AI-generated content has become a major regulatory focus due to concerns about misinformation and consumer deception. Massachusetts’ SB 31 sought to impose transparency requirements on generative AI systems, such as watermarking AI-generated content and requiring clear disclosure when AI is involved in content creation. However, the bill failed due to concerns about feasibility and the technical challenges of enforcing such requirements.

Industry-Specific Regulations

Real estate and insurance emerged as contentious areas in AI regulation. Colorado’s HB 24-1057 proposed restricting landlords from using AI tools to set rental prices, citing concerns about fairness and market manipulation. New Jersey’s A537 sought to regulate predictive AI models used in insurance underwriting to prevent discriminatory pricing practices. Both bills failed due to industry pushback and debates over economic impact.

---

---

Algorithmic Bias: A Persistent Challenge

Algorithmic bias remains one of the most complex issues in AI governance. Hawaii’s SB 2524 and New York’s A8195 both sought to mitigate discrimination in AI decision-making, particularly in employment and lending. However, these bills failed due to disagreements over definitions, scope, and enforcement mechanisms.

The Path Forward for AI Regulation

Despite these failures, AI regulation remains a pressing concern for lawmakers, businesses, and advocacy groups. Policymakers will need to refine legislative approaches to ensure AI regulations are practical, enforceable, and adaptable to evolving technologies. The challenge will be to craft regulations that protect consumers without stifling the potential of AI-driven innovations.

---

Organizations that wait for AI laws to pass before implementing governance measures may struggle to keep up when enforcement begins. Responsible AI governance starts now. DataProbity provides tailored compliance solutions to help organizations build ethical AI frameworks that anticipate future regulations. Stay ahead of evolving state laws and position your organization as a leader in responsible AI. Contact us today to build a governance strategy that prepares you for whatever comes next.

---